<img height="1" width="1" style="display:none;" alt="" src="https://px.ads.linkedin.com/collect/?pid=5678177&amp;fmt=gif">

USA’s Facial Recognition Act 2023 Introduced to House of Representatives

Biometric Facial Recognition Scanning

On October 27, 2023  Congressman Ted Lieu, together with five other sponsors, introduced a bill titled Facial Recognition Act of 2023, which, if passed, would limit the use of facial recognition technology (FRT) by law enforcement. 

The reasons behind introducing this Act is “a general lack of transparency, accountability, and strong limits on its use threatens Americans’ civil liberties” which has raised concerns regarding the misuse of FRT in cases involving peaceful protestors, investigating minor crimes, or arrests done solely based on FRT matches. In addition, the issue of discriminatory bias in connection with FRT has been proven by a federal study which showed that oftentimes people of color were more likely to be misidentified, and despite the fact that US citizens have a constitutionally protected right to the disclosure of investigative methods, the use of FRT is often hidden from them. 

The solutions offered by the Facial Recognition Act of 2023 would aim to “build robust safeguards that provide transparency to the American people, prevent discriminatory algorithms, ensure defendants are protected with due process rights, and limit the use of the technology to only necessary cases.”

The below are some of the goals the Act achieves, according to the official documentation published: 

 

Places strong limits and prohibitions on law enforcement use of FRT

  • Limits law enforcement use of FRT to situations when a warrant is obtained that shows probable cause that an individual committed a serious violent felony.
  • Prohibits law enforcement from using FRT to create a record documenting how an individual expresses rights guaranteed by the Constitution, e.g. lawfully protesting.
  • Prohibits an FRT match from being the sole basis upon which probable cause can be established for a search, arrest, or other law enforcement action.
  • Prohibits law enforcement use of FRT to enforce immigration laws.
  • Bans the use of FRT in conjunction with databases that contain illegitimately obtained information and body cameras, dashboard cameras, and aircraft cameras.
  • Bans the use of FRT to track individuals with live or stored video footage.
  • Ensures that nothing in the bill preempts state or local governments from FRT bans or moratoriums.

 

Provides transparency to individuals and protects defendants’ rights

  • Establishes a private right of action for individuals harmed by the use of FRT.
  • Requires law enforcement to provide notice to individuals who are subjects of an FRT search and a copy of the court order and/or other key data points.
  • Requires law enforcement to purge the photos of individuals who are younger than 18, were released without charge, had charges dismissed, or were acquitted of the charged offense from FRT arrest photo databases every six months.

 

Ensures annual assessments and reporting on law enforcement use of FRT

  • Requires regular auditing of FRT systems used by law enforcement agencies and suspensions for agencies that fail audits.
  • Requires annual, independent testing of any FRT system that law enforcement employs.
  • Requires detailed FRT judicial and prosecutorial reporting as well as data collection.


Having been introduced to the House of Representatives, the bill will now go through the usual legislative process. If passed there, it will then be referred to the Senate and, later on, will be sent to the President.